Question 1

Which has more calories, Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt or Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt?

Accepted Answer

Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90 calories per 100g, while Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt has 93 calories per 100g. Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has fewer calories.

Question 2

Which has more protein, Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt or Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt?

Accepted Answer

Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt contains 2.01g protein per 100g, while Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt contains 1.96g protein per 100g. Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has more protein.

Question 3

Is Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt healthier than Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt?

Accepted Answer

Both Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt and Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt have different nutritional profiles. Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt is better for weight loss (fewer calories), while Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt is better for muscle building (more protein). Choose based on your dietary goals.

Nutrient	Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt	Potatoes, baked, flesh, without salt
Macronutrients
Calories	90	93
Protein	2.0g	2.0g
Carbohydrates	20.7g	21.6g
Fat	0.1g	0.1g
Fiber	3.3g	1.5g
Sugar	—	—
Sodium	36mg	5mg
Vitamins
Vitamin A	961mcg	—
Vitamin C	19.6mg	12.8mg
Vitamin D	—	—
Vitamin B12	—	—
Minerals
Calcium	38mg	5mg
Iron	0.7mg	0.3mg
Magnesium	27mg	25mg
Potassium	475mg	391mg
Zinc	0.3mg	0.3mg

Sweet potato vs potato

Macronutrient Comparison

Better for Weight Loss

Better for Muscle Building

Better for Low-Carb Diets

Better for Digestion

Detailed Nutrition Comparison

Similar Comparisons